According to recent results from the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), 11 percent of high school students have qualified as “current” electronic cigarette users this year, meaning they reported vaping the previous month. It is down about 20 percent in 2020 and about 2 percent in 2019-2019 – 60 percent in two years. Both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which conducted the survey, and the Food and Drug Administration, which regulates electronic nicotine delivery systems (FDA), welcomed the evidence that the “epidemic” of juvenile vaping was declining.
Just kidding. While acknowledging the sharp decline in e-cigarette use by teenagers would result in new bans on vaping products, including a ban on e-liquid flavors by ex-smokers, which the CDC and FDA prefer to ignore the downward trend.
The CDC emphasizes that approximately 2.0 million young people in “high school and middle school” were estimated to be current e-cigarette users in 2021, adding that “it is unsafe for young people to use tobacco products in any form, including e-cigarettes.” The products do not contain tobacco and do not burn anything, which explains why they are much less dangerous than cigarettes, so the CDC is not only habitually wrong with their “tobacco products” but also intentionally confusing. Slippery sound Insecure Similarly hides a huge difference in risk.
The FDA says recent survey results show that “youth e-cigarette use remains. [a] Serious public health concerns. “But you assess that concern, it’s certainly not in the same ballpark as cigarette smoking, which according to the CDC causes more than 400,000 premature deaths a year in the United States. , Will mention at least one in addition to the alarm about teenagers vaping.
Lest that fear begin to fade, the CDC warns that it would be misleading to compare the 2021 NYTS results with the numbers from 2020 onwards. “The 2021 NYTS was conducted entirely in the global Covid-1 pandemic epidemic, at which time eligible students will be able to participate. The survey will be conducted in the classroom, at home or elsewhere,” the 2021 NYTS report said. “Location-based tobacco use estimates may differ due to potential under-reporting of tobacco use behavior or other unfinished traits among young people participating outside of the classroom. “
In other words, students who have completed the survey at home may be less honest than students who have completed it at school. While this is possible, it also makes sense that there is an increased sense of privacy at home Increased Frankly, a footnote to the CDC report notes that “15.0% of high school students surveyed in school buildings or classrooms currently use e-cigarettes,” which is still 23 percent lower than the 2020 rate (19.6 percent) and 2019 45 percent less than the rate in (27.5 percent).
If “other unmeasured features” explain why those who surveyed homes this year were less likely to report vaping in the previous month, the number of schools is probably confusingly higher. Moreover, the change in methodology does not explain the 29 percent reduction in “current” e-cigarette use by high school students between 2019 and 2020, which the CDCO is keen to ignore.
The results of the 2021 survey are particularly disturbing due to the FDA’s agency bias against nicotine liquids in flavors other than tobacco, which is very popular among adults who move from smoking to vaping, a change that dramatically reduces their health risks. Mitch Zeller, director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, said: “This information highlights the fact that flavored e-cigarettes are still very popular with children. “The FDA continues to take action against those who sell or target e-cigarettes and e-liquids to children, such as denying more than a million premarket requests for flavored electronic nicotine delivery system products this year. Comes out of hand.
Although the statement is vague, the district says the “flavored electronic nicotine delivery system products” are unbearable because teenagers like them. This interpretation is consistent with the FDA’s regulatory decisions. The company has rejected or rejected “premarket” applications for millions of flavored vaping products while emphasizing their appeal to teenagers. It said it would only allow flavored liquids to remain on the market if manufacturers presented “strong,” “reliable,” and “product-specific” evidence that their benefits to quitting smokers outweighed their risk that they would encourage immature vaping.
As a general rule, the potential life-saving benefits of e-cigarettes for millions of smokers easily outweigh the dangers posed by juvenile vaping, which has always been exaggerated and now seems to be diminishing. Nonetheless, it is unclear whether even the largest manufacturers, for whom the FDA feels the kind of costly research is required – can convince the agency that the approval of flavored vaping products is “appropriate for public health,” taking into account the overall population risks and benefits. “
Those criteria, mandatory under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act 2009, give the agency a greater chance of rejecting an application based on a collective calculation, both scientifically questionable and morally objectionable. The amount of steam that teenagers are taking in instead of smoking, which recent trends say is happening, should be counted as a public health benefit. And even if some adolescents who otherwise would have become regular papermen without ever using nicotine, that fact probably would not support depriving adult smokers of the harm-reducing alternative to cigarettes. A taste ban would make those options less attractive, discourage some smokers from quitting, and turn some vapors back into more dangerous habits. The result will be smoking-related deaths rather than otherwise.
Seven years after the FDA first confirmed its authority to control e-cigarettes, it has not yet been approved. No Vaping product, which means All Among them are “marketed illegally” and “subject to enforcement measures at the discretion of the FDA.” The FDA continues to promote “serious public health concerns” raised by underage vaping, without acknowledging that the evidence to support those concerns is now weaker than before, and the prudence of the agency’s decision to exercise.
“For many years, the enemies of steam products and their competitors in the press have worked to their advantage [of] Amanda Wheeler, president of the American Steam Producers Association, said in a press release that big tobacco is trying to control our products. Mirage, and deep-pocket anti-vaping activist groups continue to ignore or conceal the large-scale public health benefits of our products. Our government and some of our patriarchal working class feel hellish about banning the most effective smoking cessation system ever enacted. It’s going to drive millions of people to smoke and spend countless lives and to be honest, it’s reprehensible. “