Texas clinics cancel abortion appointments after court reinstate ban

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) – Clinics in Texas on Saturday canceled their booked appointments during a 48-hour recovery from the most prohibited abortion law in the United States, which came into effect after tired suppliers turned to the Supreme Court again.

The Biden administration, which has sued Texas over a bill known as Senate Bill 8, has yet to say whether it will go that route after a federal appeals court re-established the law late Friday. The latest twist comes just two days after a lower court in Austin suspended the law, which prohibits abortion after cardiac activity has been detected, usually six weeks before, as some women know they are pregnant. This is no exception in the case of rape or incest.

There was no immediate comment from the White House on Saturday.

At least for now, the law is in the hands of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which allows the sanctions to be resumed with further arguments pending. Meanwhile, Texas abortion providers and patients have returned to exactly where they had been for most of the past six weeks.

Out-of-state clinics were already flooded with abortions for Texas patients again many women had the closest option. Suppliers say others are being forced to carry the pregnancy term, or are waiting in the hope that the court will overturn the law, which takes effect Sept. 1.

There are also new questions কিনা whether anti-abortion advocates will try to punish Texas doctors who performed abortions during short windows The law was suspended from late Wednesday to late Friday. Texas leaves the application only to private citizens who can collect 10,000 10,000 or more in damages if they successfully sue abortion providers for violating the ban.

Texas Right to Life, the state’s largest anti-abortion group, has created a tip line to get violators reported. About a dozen calls came after U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman suspended the law, the group’s law secretary, John Sigo, said.

Although some Texas clinics said they started abortions briefly on patients older than six weeks, Sego said there were no cases in his group’s work. He said the clinics’ public statements “did not match what we saw on the ground”, which he said included a network of observers and a crisis pregnancy center.

“I have no credible evidence at the moment of the lawsuit,” Sego said Saturday.

There were about two dozen abortion clinics in Texas before the law went into effect. According to the Center for Reproductive Rights, at least six clinics begin abortions six weeks after pregnancy during recovery.

Amy Hagstrom Miller, president and CEO at Whole Women’s Health, which has four abortion clinics in Texas, said she doesn’t have an abortion number for patients over six weeks but it’s “quite a few.” He said his clinics have again complied with the law and acknowledged the risks his doctors and staff have taken.

“Of course we’re all worried,” he said. “But we also feel a deep commitment to providing abortion care when it’s legal to do so, we did it.”

Pitman, the federal judge who suspended Texas Law on Wednesday with a 113-page opinion, was appointed by President Barack Obama. He called the law an “objectionable deprivation” of the constitutional right to abortion, but his verdict was quickly overturned in a one-page order through the 5th Circuit on Friday night – at least for now.

That same appeals court previously allowed Texas sanctions to take effect in September, in a separate case brought by abortion providers. This time, the judiciary has given the judiciary time to respond by 5 pm on Tuesday.

It is unknown at this time what he will do after leaving the post. The Texas Court of Appeals is requesting a permanent injunction that would allow the law to stand in the way of the lawsuit.

Meanwhile, Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, called on the Supreme Court to “stop and stop this madness.” Last month, the High Court allowed the law to proceed with a 5-4 decision, although it did so without ruling on the constitutionality of the law.

A 1992 Supreme Court decision barred states from banning abortions before they could take effect, where an unborn child could survive outside the womb, about 24 weeks of gestation. But the Texas version has overtaken the court because of its fancy implementation system that applies to private citizens and not prosecutors, which critics say is a favor.

The Biden administration could take the case back to the Supreme Court and quickly restore Pitman’s order, although it’s not clear if they will.

“I’m not very optimistic about what could happen in the Supreme Court,” said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond, about the potential of the judiciary.

“But there aren’t too many negative aspects, are there?” He said. “The question is, what has changed since the last time they saw it? There is this full opinion, this whole hearing and record before the judge. So that might be enough. ”

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button