Reliance on media and elected officials is record low in Gallup polls – Reason.com

American confidence in the media is at an all-time low since the early 1970s. A new Gallup poll found that only one percent of survey respondents said they trusted the press to report news completely, fairly and accurately (up from the same percentage last year).

It marks the second lowest confidence in the media since Gallup began measuring confidence in U.S. institutions in 122. There was a record low in 2016, when only 2 percent of people said they either had “a lot of faith” in the media or a “fair amount” of faith.

In 2021, one percent of survey participants said they had a lot of faith and 2 percent had a fair amount. Meanwhile, 29 percent do not have “too much” confidence in the media and 34 percent “not at all.”

It declined significantly in the early 1970s (when 68-72 percent of people trusted the media) and in the late 1990s. In 1997, 53 percent of people had a big deal or had enough confidence in the media. But “confidence in the media, which averaged 45% since 1997, has not reached a majority level since 2003,” Gallup notes.

Confidence in the government also waned in the September 1-17 survey:

Less than half of U.S. adults (%%) say they have a fair amount or confidence in people holding or running for government office, a record low of 422% in 2016. ) Expressing the same kind of confidence in the judgment of the American people under the democratic system, the lowest Gallup has been measured so far but not significantly different from the 56% reading of 2016 and 2020.

The Gallup trend in 1972 (for politicians) and 1974 (for the American people) on these measures reflected a steady decline in confidence in politicians and voters over the next few decades. Americans are more likely to show confidence in voters than consistently running for office or running for office, but both tendencies generally spread in the 2000s and again in the 2010s.

In a 1974 Gallup poll, 68 percent of people said they had a big deal or a fair amount of trust in elected officials.

There is also a lack of confidence in the federal government’s ability to handle foreign and domestic issues.

The Gallup reported in September that “since last year the federal government’s confidence in dealing with international problems has fallen by a percentage point to a record low%, and now meets the level of confidence in tackling its internal problems.” In addition, confidence in the judiciary – still at 54 percent – has declined by 13 percentage points since 2020.

Gallup noted that “in every lesson since 1997, the public has shown more confidence in the federal government’s judicial branch than in the executive and legal branches” (led by the president). “

In a September poll, 44 percent of Americans said they believed in the executive branch and 37 percent said they believed in Congress.

Free mind

Google and YouTube are adding climate change denial to the list of things you can’t say if you want to monetize your video or website. The ban applies to content that includes “well-established scientific sensitivities about the existence and causes of climate change” and “content that refers to climate change as a hoax,” warming, and denies greenhouse gas emissions or human activity. . “

The move is part of a growing effort to tackle misinformation online, with some technology companies under increasing pressure from lawmakers (or otherwise). But in this case, Google refers to the will of the advertiser and the user, not the official pressure. From Axios:

Google says it is making these changes in response to frustration Their messages from advertisers and content creators are displayed alongside climate denial.

  • “Advertisers don’t just want their ads to appear next to their content. And publishers and creators don’t want ads to promote these claims to appear on their pages or videos,” the company said.

Yes but: Google often changes its advertising policy to reduce misinformation, but this update is significant considering how difficult it is to deny or misrepresent certain comments about climate change.

  • The technology giant says that when evaluating content against the new policy, “we will look at the context in which the claims were made, the difference between the content in which the false claim is stated to be true, versus the content reported or discussed.”

Free market

Democrats disagree on spending priorities. With their 3.5 3.5.5 trillion spending bill looking less likely to become a reality, Democrats are forced to prioritize – and some don’t like it. But their infighting over what should be spent could ultimately prove to be a blessing in disguise for some of their more serious spending plans. Representative Susan Delbin (D-Wash.), Who chairs the New Democrat Coalition, told NBC News the 95-member coalition has four priorities:

Paying most families $ 3,000 to $ 3,600 per child per year in cash, continuing the expanded Obamacare subsidy under the American Rescue Plan, closing the Medicaid coverage gap, and taking “big steps” in measures to tackle climate change.

The narrow and deep outlook, he said, “will avoid short-term hills which means important programs cannot be extended.”

But some leading progressives want to go in a different direction.

“If we have to do a little pruning, all we want to do is prioritize and these programs are fully represented but probably for a few years, because I don’t think we can choose between childcare and climate change.” Representative Pramila Jaipal, D-Wash, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told MSNBC on Tuesday.

Contradictory views are a challenge for Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, DNY, because they listen to the demands of their members. The three leaders have been tasked with drafting a huge bill that could go through the smallest margin in Congress, a zero margin for error in an equally divided Senate, and only three votes to lose in the House before it collapses.

Everyone has their priorities. Not everyone can be met.


California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed into law a law banning “stealing.” – That is, secretly removing the condom without the permission of the sexual partner. E.g. Because Roundup As mentioned in September, the law will be the first of its kind in the United States, creating a positive consent for effective condom removal. Under the new measure, “a person carries a sexual battery that makes contact between the genitals, from which the condom was removed, and the intimate part of another who did not verbally consent to the removal of the condom.”

Hit fast

The Senate yesterday voted to increase the eddy limit to 40 billion. The BBC reports that the breakthrough came less than two weeks after the United States was unable to repay a loan for the first time. “U.S. lawmakers still need to address this issue closer to the new December deadline to avoid default.”

September The unemployment rate fell to 4.8 percent in September.

The Long Beach Police Department announced yesterday that California school police who shot a woman in the head while fleeing the war are being investigated for murder.

Net New Netflix Movie Guilty “As much as it is progressive and not critical of the police, it pretends to be,” he said Salon.

“America” is all about ending, ”Derek Thompson complained Atlantic. “The lack of everything is not the result of a major disruption between the Vietnamese factory or the American trucking industry. We are reducing all kinds of supplies because of the real hydra of the disruption.”

A federal appeals court has “rejected a challenge from journalism associations trying to argue against the release in Assembly Bill 5 that appealed to freelance writers, arguing that it restricted freedom of speech.” Mountains. AB5 is California law that redefines many independent contractors and gig workers as employees.

It looks dangerous:

The Enablers Act analyzes a key concept that analysts say is already standardized in most other countries. The key provision is: lawyers, investment advisers, industry vendors, realtors, accountants, public relations firms and others must work “appropriately” to avoid paying or trying to get around with their clients. Money of dubious origin.

Culture More horror stories from the College Culture War:

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button