The last decade has seen considerable concern about growing income inequality in the United States. Over the past few years, several researchers, including my colleague at Ball State University and myself, have argued that regional inequality is equal if there is no greater pressure than increasing income inequality between individuals.
Counties in the United States have been growing more unevenly since the 1970s, reversing a century or more of economic turmoil. It is creating a place that is rich or poor. Now Covid is exacerbating that regional inequality, creating a vicious cycle of poor education resulting in lower vaccination rates, which already slows weak economic growth.
The most recent two monthly job reports for states 2 jobs mark the first job report to capture the impact of state employment that ended up paying an additional $ 600 a week in unemployment benefits under the Care Act. This is the first job report to capture the revival of Kovid which is now rapidly advancing in different parts of the country.
The most interesting are the geographical clustering and economic performance of Kovid.
From April to June, the 26 states that cut the extra 300 300 in the summer grew as fast as 72%, like the rest of the country, according to my calculations. The most charitable realization of their policy decision was a hope that it would encourage employment. But from June to July, as all these states lose benefits, their work growth slows significantly. From June to July, the faster those states kept benefits intact, the faster their growth increased by 64%, my math shows.
“The increase in vaccine rates per percentage point is related to an increase of 1.2 percentage points in job growth.”
A study published in August gave some clues as to why this might be. Using the banking data of these recipients of unemployment insurance, the authors report that some recipients who lost benefits have found jobs and almost all have run out of family savings. These cuts have put an end to the economic stimulus of these states, slowing down employment growth.
But more than a short-term policy error is contributing to these different results within the state.
According to my calculations, from April to June, 25 vaccinated states increased employment by about 80% in 25 vaccinated states. This was before the resurgence of COVID began. From June to July, employment growth in these states fell to just 67% of the 25 vaccinated states.
I have noticed that the correlation between ticker rates and job growth is unclear. An increase of one percentage point per vaccine rate is related to an increase of 1.2 percentage points in the increase in work. But economic performance across the state is not just cutting off a few months of epidemic stimulus or reviving Covid. This is where the rate of vaccination clashes with regional inequality – the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer.
Educational achievement plays a surprising role in vaccine rates. A recent study found that 76% of college graduates are vaccinated, while only 53% of high school graduates. Educational deviations in healthcare outcomes are common, but they differ in two important ways. First, the large difference in vaccine rates through education is unusual. Before Kovid, the vaccine was almost universally accepted. Second, older Americans are unequally vaccinated. Approximately 5% of people aged 655 or older have been vaccinated, while only half of those aged 25 to 0 have been vaccinated.
The difference between education and age is strange because young adults have significantly higher educational attainments than older Americans. Thus, with a little algebra it becomes clear that it is the younger, less-educated adults who are unequally obsolete. And they tend to be poor.
There is no easy solution
All of this highlights the growing policy challenge to growing inequality across counties, cities, and states in the United States. It turns out that income inequality within the family is relatively easy to fix. We just continue to pay more taxes to the rich and transfer those dollars to the poor, as we have been doing for a century. This remedy has largely eliminated the type of Dickensian Penuri that is prevalent in most parts of the world.
However, there is no simple policy tool to eliminate economic inequality between spaces. The circular challenge presented by Covid should clear this up. The low level of educational attainment in a state results in a low tick rate. Low vaccination rates suppress job growth and result in a weak economic situation. It instead persuades elected leaders to adopt a policy that treats symptoms rather than causes.
In the case of the Kovid epidemic, these policies further weaken the economy, reducing resources to increase educational attainment. It’s a hamster wheel of frustration and fertilizer for populist demagoguery, the core of the populist backlash that drove both Barney Sanders and Donald Trump to the presidential election campaign.
I only use COVID as an example. The epidemic did not cause these problems, it only exacerbated and exposed them. While achieving advanced education will reduce economic inequality, it is not the whole problem. After all, vaccines not only protect against disease separately, they also protect neighbors, friends and their children.
Dark tendencies that reject vaccines are not just a matter of ignorance. They express a rejection of individual responsibilities that are hostile to the success of a vibrant, modern economy. It will take more than a good school to solve this problem. But, until we find a solution, let’s hope for continued diversity between America’s rich and poor places.
Michael J. Hicksiber.
Michael J. Texas, California and Indiana give wonderful lessons about low taxes and economic growth
Also: This is the dark side of being proud of the low cost of living in cities