Section 8 revolves around the juncture of economy and politics. Let’s just bring the elephant home: Chapter 8 is one of the divisive issues in the real estate industry.
Some people despise Article 8 on philosophical or political grounds. Some people prefer Article 8 and believe that it meets a desperate need in this country. Others are just agnostics – they take it for granted and plan accordingly.
Despite the obstacles to an objective conversation about Article 8, it is worth the effort because we can stay in the context of the largest expansion of the Housing Choice Voucher – or Section 8 – program. And if President Biden’s campaign proposal and recently proposed legislation actually bring it to the political finish line, there could be a whole new federal program to help tenants pay rent and help buyers buy their first home.
These things will take years to happen … and they can easily evaporate in thin air. This is a chaotic problem, since most problems are found when working with money and politics.
But some may argue that we do not have housing problems in this country. In particular, we lack affordable, affordable housing units for low-income families. Our lack has caused many of the Section 8 bias that real estate investors and property owners carry with them: run-down buildings concentrated in areas that degrade property quality and poorly managed local housing authorities যা all of which create a negative reaction. , Systematic progress seems impossible.
So let’s hold our noses together and go to the mailstrom. The effects are important.
What is happening now
Article 8 is administered by thousands of state and regional housing authorities at the local level, but all money flows from the top – the federal government’s Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
As of 2020, approximately 2.2 million households have received vouchers for section and rent assistance. Less than 70% of these vouchers go to families of elderly, disabled and young children. And only 20% of families who qualify for vouchers can actually get them. The Biden Administration chapter wants to “fully fund”, which means every eligible family can get a voucher.
HUD has managed only ২৫ 25 billion of its total budget of about ৫ 55 billion for housing vouchers in 2020. The Biden administration is trying to add about ৫ 5 billion to the current fiscal year’s budget, which will help another 200,000 families join the voucher program. But getting a big, variable increase through Congress will cost a lot of money – about 400 400 billion in about 10 years, according to some preliminary congressional budget office (CBO) estimates.
Real estate news and commentary
This page is the source for your news and market trends that influence your real estate investors from top to bottom. Successful real estate investors need to look at all aspects of their investment, including market trends and regional or national economic issues. Here, experienced investors and analysts provide up-to-date data, news and comments on major changes taking place in the real estate market. If you’re looking for a more in-depth dialogue in your particular market, you can find more specific discussions in your area on our local real estate networking forum. Start a discussion there today!
Real estate news and commentary
Biden’s campaign proposal was to spend 6 640 billion over 10 years to close the home ownership gap. This includes:
- Those who need rent and home buying assistance – typically, those who spend more than 0% of their monthly income on rent, or those who spend less than 50% of a region’s average income, and
- The roaring housing market, where rents and prices are rising faster than GDP growth and faster than wages.
The Biden administration initially tried to pass the money through an infrastructure bill, but the inevitable political debate resulted in the Senate being given a very watery package. The next step in raising the HUD fund will be through budget reconciliation, which Democrats can do. Theoretically Do it with a simple majority in the Senate.
We’ll see. Many dangers await. But the initial political will seems to be strong. New bills are also being drafted that will clearly increase vouchers from $ 3 million to $ 4 million over the next few years, if passed. Otherwise the size of the current program will be doubled, if not more.
Kovid is rethinking our economy
Kovid’s response has touched more than health and safety issues – the epidemic is becoming a growing economic and political force. Perhaps most importantly, the epidemic introduced a new philosophical approach to government spending.
We have seen two broad stimulus programs, both of which had a large share of housing relief and housing assistance যেমন such as rent waivers, mortgage tolerance, deferrals, and direct financial support for mortgage-backed securities. We did the stimulus and it didn’t break anything, as well as we could say. This is a good sign and it is the most recent sign, to keep the political friction easy.
Will vouchers increase?
There are a number of factors that increase the likelihood of a change in Section 8 funding.
Democrats are in control
It’s pretty simple. Dames has the White House and Congress – although the Senate is divided, and a Democratic senator from West Virginia, a nominal Democrat, has already clashed with the rest of the Democrats several times.
Token arguments against deficits or budget increases are declining
Republicans would naturally and reflectively reverse any increase in federal spending under Article 8, as they would at any cost, anywhere. It’s their move. The GOP is already trying to put up a flag about “big government repression and deficit growth”. But that’s a tough narrative in 2021, when the GOP has approved nearly tr tr trillion in new spending on tax cuts and stimulus over the past few years.
I’m not saying they won’t try to sell the same narrative yet – only their efforts can fall on deaf ears.
The fact of the matter is that since 2009, we have been running money printing presses until they come out of the steam – and the economy is doing well. This leaves some old arguments about the catastrophe of deficits in the past.
Section 8 prevents growth
In addition to the political turmoil, there are some functional problems that we will face with the massive increase in Article 8.
Many homeowners will not accept vouchers
In privately owned housing in most parts of the country, it is up to the landlord to accept a Housing Choice Voucher (HCV). It is not mandatory. Some people don’t do it because of bias, meaning “Article 8 tenants are bad tenants and I don’t want to deal with it / them.” And some do not because of the numerous inspection programs and certificates that have to be done each year, which is costly and time consuming for the property owner.
And if something goes wrong and an inspection fails, one or more tenants may need to boot, which hinders the property owner’s cash flow. Messy things.
Regional aspects also play a role. Some states and municipalities have problems paying instantly or reliably, and landlords there have spread their anecdotes with local grapes. And while it is federal law that a landlord is free to reject any potential tenant, including HCV, more than a dozen states and 100 municipalities have passed legislation to overturn federal law. These are known as the “source of income” law, which widely states that no one can be rejected because of his rent or source of income.
Housing authorities need reform
We probably need to redesign the entire management structure of the HCV program. How it is managed, what the income limits are, how inspections and certifications are done – all include a top-down change. This is the only way to ensure that more property owners accept Section 8 vouchers and “join the system”.
Increase the level of your investment
Imagine you are friends with hundreds of real estate investors and entrepreneurs. Now imagine you can have a beer with each of them and easily chat about failures, successes, inspirations and lessons learned. That’s what we’re seeing with The Bigger Pockets Podcast.
Maximum Chapter 8 Wave effects of the program
Let’s put all the political things aside for a moment and guess what it would mean if everyone who qualifies for a housing voucher gets one. That would mean nearly million million additional family vouchers-a huge addition to the pool of Americans who can rent the entire market.
If we assume that everything else in the economy will remain the same in the coming years – moderate GDP growth, job growth, wage growth and moderate interest rates – then our housing market will be extremely strong.
We already know that there is a chronic shortage of transactions as the millennium enters the years of major home purchases and Americans are looking for more extensive rural and suburban homes. Short list of homes, rising incomes and a huge new pool of market-providing tenants Equal to higher rents in every region of the country. Regionally, there will be differences between how fast the increase in section v vouchers affects the average rent and the average property price, but it will be a rising tide. This is just an objective argument, not something political.
One could easily theorize that having more than one million families in this country would create a precise cycle, as household stability leads more people to more stable jobs, better education, and so on. Can we do everything without breaking the proverbial bank or causing a federal financial catastrophe? I will leave it for another discussion in another forum. Overall, we should all see a huge increase in Section 8 if it can be managed properly.
Our other entitlement programs, such as Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment insurance are all extremely popular … at least in the sense that politicians do not dare to touch both sides of their ears because their constituents like the programs. So if Democrats can turn off sales-centricity to make affordable housing an entitlement program, it’s likely to stay in place.
The Kovid epidemic has only highlighted the gaps in our economy related to income equality and housing. It will take time, money, political will and a burden of political power to change the section funding. I don’t know if the four of us will be enough to implement the administration’s goals.
However, the appointment of Marcia Fudge as HUD secretary is a sign that the will of the Biden administration is strong. He wants to make Section 8 an entitlement program, a right rather than a possibility, and he seems to have the full support of the White House.