FINANCE

Facebook again asks judge to dismiss US lawsuit by Reuters Instagram, WhatsApp for sale


ছবি Photo from Reuters file: This photo, taken on December 2, 2011, shows the Facebook logo on a mobile phone.

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Facebook Inc. on Monday asked a judge to dismiss a U.S. government-revised no-confidence lawsuit that forced the social media giant to sell Instagram and WhatsApp after throwing out its previous version.

Facebook (Nasdaq 🙂 has filed a lawsuit alleging that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) failed to provide a reasonable practical basis for an illegal monopoly branding of Facebook. The agency added that it appeared the FTC “had no basis for a naked allegation that Facebook had or does have exclusive rights.”

The FTC’s revised lawsuit was filed in August, adding more details to its allegations that the social media company had crushed or bought rivals and again asked U.S. District Court Judge James Boyasberg for the District of Columbia.

Boasberg ruled in June that the FTC’s main allegation, filed in December, failed to prove that Facebook has a monopoly power in the social media market.

The FTC has long argued in its revised allegation that Facebook dominates the US personal social networking market with more than 5% of monthly active users since 2012.

The Facebook filing states that the FTC’s complaint “contrasts with the commercial reality of intense competition with competitors like TickTock and other attractive options for customers.”

The FTC filed a revised lawsuit with a 3-2 vote on the party line in August and rejected Facebook’s request that the agency’s chair, Lina Khan, be re-used.

Facebook said Monday that the court should dismiss the complaint because Khan’s participation in the decision to file the (amended complaint) violates due process and federal ethics policy. It called the amended allegations “invalid” because Khan had failed to refute himself.

An FTC spokesman did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

The company reiterated its request in August that the court order Facebook to sell Instagram, which it bought for 1 1 billion in 2012, and WhatsApp, which it bought in 2014 for 19 19 billion.

“FTC’s fictional market ignores competitive realities: Facebook competes with TickTock, iMessage, Twitter (NYSE :), Snapchat, LinkedIn, YouTube, and countless others that help people share, connect, communicate, or simply entertain,” Facebook said. . “The FTC cannot reliably claim that Facebook has exclusive power because there is no such power.”

Disclaimer: Fusion Media I would like to remind you that the data on this website is not necessarily real-time or accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and forex prices are provided by market makers rather than exchanges, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from actual market prices, meaning prices are not indicative and suitable for trading purposes. Therefore, Fusion Media is not responsible for any of your trading losses as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media Or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not assume any liability for loss or damage as a result of relying on the information contained in this website, including data, quotes, charts and buy / sell signals. Please be fully aware of the risks and costs associated with trading in the financial markets, this is one of the potential risky investment forms.





Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button