By Phil Klein for RealClear Politics
Government officials are increasingly acting as if they are somehow out of criticism. But the truth is just the opposite নাগর citizens have a responsibility to be transparent and accountable and have to face criticism for that.
The persuasion to avoid criticism and liability, and in some cases even criminalizing dissent, is most evident in the context of the debate over electoral integrity. In Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and elsewhere, government officials have insulted public criticism and attacked anyone who dares to question their behavior.
In Arizona, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors aggressively refused to cooperate in good faith with the recently concluded state Senate audit of the 2020 election, even after the court ordered Subpener to comply with demands to return their election materials and information.
Related: Governor Desantis vows to protect Florida parents ‘free speech’ against DJs and FBI
When observers expressed concern that some election information had been withheld, for example, the board arrogantly Responded The information that was archived, and was not returned because Subpona did not explicitly specify the archived data.
The board seemed perfectly happy with the deputy’s resignation, although doing so only served to increase confusion and suspicion about the election.
In Wisconsin, Democrat Gov. Tony Evers recently urged municipal clerks to become “lawyers” before the state legislature spoke to the special council office to investigate the 2020 election.
Special Counsel, retired Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gabbleman, made it very clear that the purpose of the investigation was not to cancel the election, but to restore public confidence in the electoral process to determine what was right and what could happen. There was a mistake in the election administration.
Conservative voice support!
Sign up to get the latest Political news, insights and commentary are delivered directly to your inbox.
The only reason clerks are “law-and-order” is if they have something to hide, such as a deliberate violation of state election law for biased purposes. If election mismanagement during the epidemic is mistaken or the law is inadvertently broken, Gableman’s view is to suggest reforms designed to strengthen the process, not just punish the clerks.
In Pennsylvania, Attorney General Josh Shapiro and every Democrat in the state Senate have filed lawsuits to block subpenas seeking information about voters as part of a comprehensive investigation into the 2020 election.
They claim the lawsuits are intended to protect voter privacy, but that the alleged threat is entirely speculative and that protecting voter privacy is not their concern, as the Democrat-led State Department shares the same information with outside vendors and private party organizations.
Pennsylvania’s voter registration system could be compromised by an agreement reached by the Democrat Secretary of State that gives digital access to a biased working group, which then allows access to other organizations, including political campaigns. Democrats in the Pennsylvania Senate appear to be working to prevent any review of the secret agreement.
In Michigan, state officials have taken a more aggressive approach, with Attorney General Dana Nessel (pictured) threatening to question the integrity of the 2020 election.
Related: Rand Paul blasts Fossie as a ‘lie’, saying he ignores natural immunity to promote mass vaccination
It is not just a matter of electoral integrity that reveals this kind of anti-democratic elitism. Marine Corps Lieutenant Colonel Stuart Schiller was in prison for criticizing the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan – in solitary confinement, no less.
Meanwhile, General Mark Millie is not responsible for his role in Afghanistan’s defeat – even after a mistaken drone strike killed seven innocent children – or his contacts with China without the president’s knowledge, or his repeated contacts with various writers and journalists.
Democracy is not supposed to work like this. Many government officials today feel that they are condemned and reprimanded, and believe that our rights are derived from the government and that, therefore, the authorities can be arbitrarily removed.
If we want to maintain our independence, the American people cannot tolerate such aristocracy from government officials. Anyone who claims to be independent must have the courage to stand up for their independence with whom no one agrees. If we don’t, we won’t be free for long.
When our elected officials refuse to be open and transparent with us, we should assume it because they are not doing their job properly and use our voting power to replace those who respect our rights as citizens.
Otherwise, we may one day see that we no longer have the option of replacing corrupt or incompetent officials.
Syndicated with permission from RealClearWire.
Opinions expressed by contributors and / or content partners do not reflect their own and not necessarily those of The Political Insider.