POLITICS

21 federal agencies run 200 different diet-related programs that lead to overlap and disorder – Reason.com


The federal government is concerned that 42 percent of American adults are obese, but not seemingly concerned enough that they have a competent, coordinated attack plan.

A new Public Accountability Office (GAO) found this in a report released publicly this week 21 federal agencies oversee 200 different efforts to research, improve crop nutritional quality, health education and food access initiatives, and control grocery stores and restaurants. The GAO acknowledges that, after the study, these are about two dozen organizations “Diet-related efforts did not effectively manage the potential for splitting or overlap and duplication,” resulting in wasting your taxpayer dollars.

Since “neither the White House nor any federal agency is responsible for leading or coordinating diet-related efforts across the government,” GAO experts recommend that Congress consider identifying and directing a federal agency or other entity to a long-term federal food strategy. Efforts to reduce Americans’ health risks. “

The current government’s efforts include “unforeseen agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency, which can help reduce the long-term health effects of air pollution in our diet.” There are general suspects, such as the Department of Health and Human Services (UHS) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), but then there are some indifferent initiatives – such as Healthy Parks Healthy People Program, part of the National Park Service Not required – and others that may be done by private sector or university researchers, such as the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service, which studies “developing more secure plant species that can maintain productivity in nutrient-depleted soils … and for use in crop development.” Advanced genetic equipment. ”Of course

The report also includes some insults from disgruntled company officials:

“Of the 16 agencies we interviewed, three mentioned federal efforts that work in cross-perspective or have conflicting results. For example, one agency said HHS and the USDA did not effectively coordinate their missions in public health and agriculture. He said the USDA’s agricultural subsidies have provided economic incentives to increase corn production, lower prices and increase the use of corn syrup in Americans’ diets.

This is a great recognition of failure on the part of government bureaucrats and regulators. “There’s really no federal strategy to guide the government’s efforts to improve the eating habits of Americans,” Steve Morris said in a GAO companion podcast. Programs “work independently without a common purpose or goal” and sometimes overlap with each other, waste resources and “fail”[ing] Focus on areas that really need attention. “

This failure comes at a huge cost: “In 2018, spending on the treatment of cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes accounted for 26 percent of total health care spending for U.S. adults, approximately 1.5 1.5 trillion,” the podcast notes. And the epidemic has put less healthy Americans at even greater risk of death, although it has fortunately subsided with the spread of the vaccine. “People who are infected with the Covid-1 contract who report an underlying health condition are six times more likely to be hospitalized and 12 times more likely to die,” the GAO said.

Needlers and bettors of libertarians often try to see what they see as a Trump card, assuming that the minareist type must seek agencies that will serve the poor and abolish our food supply. But some libertarians are OK with a small amount of federal oversight in this area, and are skeptical of the notion that regulatory agencies actually do a good job of achieving their goals; Meat radiation, for example, can kill all kinds of bacteria, the USDA considers inspections less important, but consumer groups “spread panic against it,” writes Megan McCardell. Atlantic In 2009, led to a slow adoption. Kids ’school afternoons have long been plagued by political point scoring and margin margins, with little focus on whether the guidelines rely on accurate, up-to-date nutrition science.

“Federal-funded nutrition researchers have demonstrated scientific incompetence by presenting metaphysical evidence as scientific evidence for many generations,” the researchers reported. Mayo Clinic Proceedings In a sharp complaint from the Federal Government’s Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, the agency meets every five years to help the government build its nutritional standards. The federal government’s food failure is a dozen bucks – don’t even start me on the food pyramid.

But you can’t put a one-time salad on people’s shots, even if you’re not the U.S. government, and you can’t just advise people to shop at farmers ’markets or visit Sion National Park and see them awesome. Many people will still arrive for their Big Max and seasoned checkers fry even when they have been hacked by a reputable bureaucrat. But the government, at least, if it wants to take obesity seriously, can waste a little less with our money and is a little better at measuring which interventions work best to achieve its goals.



Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button